Never bought a tegu (or anything else) from the person. I don't have to, I can get all the tegus I want for free. Wouldn't do business with him for anything, just listening to him over the phone was enough to convince me I didn't want to take any chance.
As for my morals, I don't think you know enough to make that call. Considering I'd never abandon an animal to starve to death, I think my morals are far more intact than the one you're defending. And do all the mental gymnastics you want, separating past from present, you most certainly are defending him when you make such statements as the above.
As for the piling on, I think it's safe to say I was probably the first to call Mr. Hill out on his behaviour years ago. If you worshipped Mr. Hill (or gave him money), he was your friend. If you didn't, he was an outright bully. I've been standing up to that crap the entire time I've known of him. As the facts have played out, that's not "piling on", that's called exposing the truth.
Um, you may wish to revisit the order of the debate. Wes was the one to start casting aspersions towards others morality. I gather it's ok for Wes, but no one is allowed to reciprocate? How Bobby Hill-esque.
However, here's some food for thought. Right now, across the whole continent (not just the US), us exotic pet keepers are under attack from many angles: the PETA types, people scared of reptiles, people concerned over their natural environment - all seeking to pass laws banning us and acting quite coherently. We are having a hard time opposing these challenges to our hobby partly because we find it so difficult to present a unified position. Look at the inhouse problems with USARK for one. Every little unfortunate event (snake escape, sicko feeding house pets to her large snake/gator/etc.) detracts from our position. Along comes Mr.Hill. Bully. Scams people to a still undisclosed amount (if the counts on the various forums are accurate, it numbers in the tens of thousands). Abandons his animals to die a horrible end. And some people still defend him. If you think the PETA/animal rights/ecodefendors don't monitor sites such as this, then you're extremely naive. I once thought I made a relatively neutral statement on a relatively unknown local forum about a contentious issue taking place in a distant place - before the day was over the forum was being bombarded with requests from news agencies across Canada wanting my name/address for an interview. Some of you are handing the people who want to shut us down some tasty ammunition. Guy is a bully, scams a lot of people not just locally but on an international level, and turns out to be a cold-hearted animal abuser - and the exotic pet community thinks this should be ignored in light of what some people once perceived of him, and should be sympathized with (before anyone wants to jump on me for this characterization, lets admit the fact that whether I or anyone else here sees him this way, some activists most certainly will). If I were PETA, I'd feel like xmas had just arrived. I'm not saying everyone should start denigrating Mr.Hill, I'm saying you might want to reconsider how you openly praise him. You might be undermining your own interests.
Or to put it another way: John Wayne Gacy was once considered an outstanding member of the community and a real humanitarian too.