Wilomn
New member
It seems pretty clear that Wes has a bias toward BGU or whatever they are called, and coversely, a bias against the Sperpetarium. It shows itself rather clearly and he appears to be putting a subjective spin on things to make the Seprentarium look bad. For example his post where he presents a very colored presentation of how he THINKS the whole transaction went down which based on presented evidence can only reflect his own imagination and prejudice and not the truth.
Hey ronnie, you may want to clean your glasses.
It seems pretty clear to ME that I put up a 'could have been' but never, that my ancient brain recalls, did I say THIS is what I think happened.
Now I could easily see things playing out as I suggested they might, but personally, I don't know what happened, who said what, or, in essence, what really transpired.
Neither do you.
As I HAVE stated, I don't think either of these guys has told the complete truth nor the complete story. One of them wants to cover his butt because he's in business and many think he's in that business because he's kind of a shady not so cool guy and the other one is simply a newb who got his knickers knotted too soon and went too far to garner sympathy.