- Joined
- Jan 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,345
- Reaction score
- 247
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 67
- Location
- Fiji Islands South Pacific
I KNOW this is going to attract high feelings, but I'm really curious about attitudes within the herp community.
Breeding for "abnormalities" such as albinism and stripes etc., is accepted and a huge part of the hobby. Many such come with connected issues such as risk of poor eyesight, which would be considered defects and be selected out in a wild population. From what I can see, many breeders also select such "defects" out, and breed only from individuals which have the "abnormality" but not the "defect".
However, every now and again I come across posts about animals with what would definitely be considered "defects" in a wild animal, but which are offered as "rarities" for breeding within the hobby.
So, now to my question....
Where do you draw the line between "Keep as a valuable and interesting trait" and "Cull as a defective animal or as an animal with a poor quality of life"?.
Obvious issues are albinism, eyelessness, two-headedness, I'm sure there are others that haven't occurred to me.
Breeding for "abnormalities" such as albinism and stripes etc., is accepted and a huge part of the hobby. Many such come with connected issues such as risk of poor eyesight, which would be considered defects and be selected out in a wild population. From what I can see, many breeders also select such "defects" out, and breed only from individuals which have the "abnormality" but not the "defect".
However, every now and again I come across posts about animals with what would definitely be considered "defects" in a wild animal, but which are offered as "rarities" for breeding within the hobby.
So, now to my question....
Where do you draw the line between "Keep as a valuable and interesting trait" and "Cull as a defective animal or as an animal with a poor quality of life"?.
Obvious issues are albinism, eyelessness, two-headedness, I'm sure there are others that haven't occurred to me.