Matt2979
My dawg has the bluuues.
Congrats, Craig!! Glad to hear that she's eating for you. Other than the occasional fast, she should be good to go now!
If I ever felt the need to stop assist feeding (and I haven't yet) I would give them to someone else to keep trying. There are plenty of us out there who would glady do it.
I'd go with the "never cull" a slow eater. I haven't had any go past 5-6 assist feeds before they start to turn round. If I ever felt the need to stop assist feeding (and I haven't yet) I would give them to someone else to keep trying. There are plenty of us out there who would glady do it.
But there are some snakes that will simply be non-feeders...what kind of life are you providing a snake that will not eat on its own? There has to be a line drawn somewhere.
Is there anything wrong in breeding an assist fed BP? I don't think it's genetic. And has anyone had to assist feed a BP long enough so it was of breedable size?
The idea behind breeding(in a perfect world) is to breed selectively. If you have a snake that needs to be assist fed for a prolonged period of time, that snake is perhaps not a good candidate to breed healthy, strong snakes in the future. In the wild, snakes that won't eat will not survive and therefore will not breed, and that is what keeps ball pythons a thriving species. In captivity, a snake that will not eat can be assist fed until they finally do start feeding, and they may even become a fine feeder, but does not make them a good candidate as a breeder...by breeding weaker snakes, you're diluting the gene pool.
I've never had to cull to date, but I've decided that should any snake I breed go 4 assists and not feed on their own after, they'll be put down. It's not fair to the snake and not fair to the hobby/industry to be so persistent until they finally get the hang of feeding.
Why is a snake that was assist fed as a baby not a good candidate for breeding?
Because in the wild, the strong survive. We are defying Darwinism by letting the weak reproduce. At least that's why I think they aren't a good candidate.
We are defying Darwinism by producing Morphs. A premature baby (human) would normally die on his/her own. They will mature to be perfectly healthy adults and produce 100% healthy offspring.
Because in the wild, the strong survive. We are defying Darwinism by letting the weak reproduce. At least that's why I think they aren't a good candidate.
There are plenty of humans that should not be reproducing as well.