kmurphy said:
I believe it is meant to describe a problem free, (in the veterinary sense), eating without problems, acclimated wild caught animal. If you haven't had the animal long enough to know this about the animal (with confidence), then you shouldn't be using the term.
To me, that is the best and only answer that COULD work. LTC, to me, means that the animal is established, and would do as well as a CB one in the hands of the AVERAGE keeper. Six months might be long enough to KNOW a Desert Kingsnake is cleaned up, healthy, etc. Twelve months probably isn't long enough for an imported WC Hundred Flowers snake.
If the breeder is trustworthy, LTC typically means the animal is established beyond any doubt in their mind REGARDLESS of if it has been there 6 months or 6 years. 1 month isn't long enough, I think, for any snake. There are many, however, that I would have NO qualms about selling as LTC after 6 months due to the fact that I'm convinced they'll do well for anyone that gets it.
The 1 year makes a
lot of sense - unless the animal is still troublesome - but the justification is one I can't support. The idea that one year means the animal has went through the full cycle....WHAT exactly does that mean? If it does want to brumate, would you not call it established? Sure, when it gets cool outside, it might want to brumate. Ditto for some CB animals whether they are cycled or not. I have many CB that won't eat during the winter - PERIOD. WC aren't the only one that can do that, and I wouldn't consider it a problem, anyway. Et cetera, but you get my point.
One year is just as arbitrary as 7 months and 3 days. I feel the term needs to be variable for different species and different individuals, but there should always be some implication of VERY well established in captivity! You take a risk on the survival of any WC. The risk on a LTC
should be no greater than on an adult CB.
That's MY outlook on it!
KJ