Is it me or does it seem we have a overpopulation of egomaniacal people in our hobby who feel the need to rename the same morph or ad their name to it as their own line?
Lets get real a butter is a damn lesser platinum, the new pastels (fader gene, citrus whiteout, superdupers) are producing similar effects to a Ruppel pastel that has been around forever.(Although not many around) Now with ghosts there is some difference because lines, some are not compatible but i know of 3 that all look the same with different names and when bred together they make a hypo.
There are no lines of pieds, breed one pied to any other you get a pied.
Is this ever going to end? I cant believe that there are so many in our hobby with their mundane lives that they feel the need to rename a animal that quite honestly they have no claim to.
The people that produced the animals FIRST or brought them into our lives earned that right and we belittle the things they did to make our wonderful hobby as great as it is. Just because you buy a wild caught doesnt mean its a new line. Can you prove without a doubt it has a different genetic makeup than the original one brought over? (let me answer this for you before i get a bunch of nonsense responses, unless your a Geneticist the answer is NO)
I just wonder if anyone else feels the same way and also what the different opinions on the matter are.
As you can probably tell this is a huge pet peave of mine LOL.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Lets get real a butter is a damn lesser platinum, the new pastels (fader gene, citrus whiteout, superdupers) are producing similar effects to a Ruppel pastel that has been around forever.(Although not many around) Now with ghosts there is some difference because lines, some are not compatible but i know of 3 that all look the same with different names and when bred together they make a hypo.

There are no lines of pieds, breed one pied to any other you get a pied.
Is this ever going to end? I cant believe that there are so many in our hobby with their mundane lives that they feel the need to rename a animal that quite honestly they have no claim to.
The people that produced the animals FIRST or brought them into our lives earned that right and we belittle the things they did to make our wonderful hobby as great as it is. Just because you buy a wild caught doesnt mean its a new line. Can you prove without a doubt it has a different genetic makeup than the original one brought over? (let me answer this for you before i get a bunch of nonsense responses, unless your a Geneticist the answer is NO)
I just wonder if anyone else feels the same way and also what the different opinions on the matter are.
As you can probably tell this is a huge pet peave of mine LOL.

Your thoughts would be appreciated.