Thank you bcr229. Sounds logical and reasonable he has public education health insurance.
I would just have to think that his general demeanor with snakes and media must in some ways carry into the classroom .....
The cost of his treatment therefore will accrue to all teachers and employees in the SC public education system. Their premiums will rise in the next contract year under usual increases; plus the costs of this stupid act. It is further possible that public school retirees are under a similar umbrella - perhaps in the same carrier plan. If so, the retiree's costs will increase. Every state legislature and governor are grappling with increasing health care costs and will no doubt hear from constituents about not repeating "such an avoidable circumstance". There is no doubt in this case that elected officials and lobbyists from many corporate and societal interests will work to reduce opportunities to keep hots in SC.
Seems to me, the reptile community needs to self police to the extent possible. Conscientious keepers and show owners could do a number of things to help optics of the industry. The industry has an association - USARK. (I am a member but otherwise have no part in its management or governance).
Membership in a trade organization creates strength of purpose and influence. Membership can also influence trade organization direction and policies. If show owners required table renters to be members of USARK - such would bolster USARK abilities and representation. (For example, I belong to a couple sport shooting gun clubs - all of which predicate club membership on membership in the NRA or NSSF plus local proof of clean background). USARK must then also be firm in carrying out its mission to be credible to both membership and the public alike. It has been many years since I kept hots so I am out of that information loop. Perhaps the conscientious hot keepers could develop some kind of standardized credibility "certificate" of training or knowledge. Perhaps USARK could do something in this regard. Since all the media outlets are public - conscientious reptile keepers could broadly expose bad actors. Then members could avoid buying and selling to such individuals. As with any affinity group, if reptile keepers remain fragmented and without common representation, then governmental agencies will control and reduce the hobby. I think if reptile keepers endorsed harsh penalties for bad actors such would go a long way to preserve the hobby. If the industry (e.g. show owners and buyers) marginalized the bad actors such would go a long way to preserve the hobby.
Readers - ideas ?
The hobby / industry is under increasing assail and scrutiny. If the participants don't do something among themselves then the reptile community will continue to shrink and opportunities will diminish.
As I have previously posted in FC, reptile keepers can know and understand how USARK is funded and how it spends its revenue. Here is the link to USARK's most recent IRS Form 990 tax filing (2022). Scroll through the filing and you can see board members, revenue, expenses, salary of officers, and more. One could expect the 2023 to soon be public as well.
Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as well as download tax filings going back as far as 2001.
projects.propublica.org
You will note the IRS requires 501(c)3 organizations to declare their MIssion and purpose(s) on page 1. In this case USARK states:
"Briefly describe the organization’s mission or most significant activities: SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION BASED ADVOCACY FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF, AND TRADE IN REPTILES. TO ENDORSE CAGING STANDARDS, SOUND HUSBANDRY, ESCAPE PREVENTION PROTOCOLS, AND AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO VITAL CONSERVATION ISSUES."
Note: "... responsible private ownership" and "... escape prevention protocols".
I have not seen (and could have missed) - has USARK posted a press release about this incident? Taken a stand on the irresponsible nature of the bite circumstances and free handling a taipan? Sent correspondence to SC governor's office denouncing the victim's actions? Etc. If the trade association does not take a firm stand - even a zero tolerance stand - then it is not true to its stated mission and cannot be effective on behalf of reptile keepers.
Note: I edited "NC" to "SC" in my previous comments.